South Gippsland farmer convicted of animal cruelty as a result of fly outbreak

A former South Gippsland councilor was fined $ 50,000 and banned from proudly owning or controlling any animals for 10 years after he was convicted of animal cruelty.

Justice of the Peace Tony Burns denied six of the 22 allegations made in opposition to Jeremy Wealthy, however discovered that the remaining 16, together with allegations of animal cruelty, had been true past an inexpensive doubt.

The Latrobe Valley Justice of the Peace Court docket heard allegations involving 33 sheep belonging to Mr. Wealthy, which suffered from a fly, a few of which had been paralyzed and killed, but additionally heard contextual proof that the illness affected many others.

Flystrike is a severe animal welfare drawback when fly maggots feed on broken pores and skin of the host sheep.

The court docket additionally discovered that as much as 50 sheep had been discovered within the pit in varied states of decomposition and predation.

In his sentencing, Magist Burns stated Mr Wealthy’s inaction had brought about “wonderful struggling for the sheep”.

Liam McAuliff, prosecutor for the Division of Employment, Precincts and Areas, stated that extreme punishment must be used to discourage others.

The previous deputy rejects the choice

Mr. Wealthy rejected this argument.

On the second day of the listening to, Mr. Wealthy was an hour late, refusing to cross-examine witnesses or give closing arguments.

Jeremy Wealthy in Morwell(Jarrod Whittaker (ABC Gippsland) )

Justice of the Peace Burns opened the proceedings and stated he was happy that Mr Wealthy had been provided procedural justice, provided that “he was out of court docket yesterday”.

The principle witness, District Veterinarian Will Hume, appeared for cross-examination by Mr. Wealthy, however he was shortly launched.

Mr. Wealthy was additionally ordered to pay $ 3,288 for the witness’s keep and $ 4,065 for the Division’s authorized prices.

This occurred after Mr. Wealthy was warned that he was at risk of contempt of court docket.

Mr. Wealthy was additionally ordered to pay court docket prices, in addition to the time of witnesses he supposed to cross-examine.

Mr Wealthy stated he would problem the costs.

“It’s fairly clear that there’s an inappropriateness right here,” he stated.

“It merely got here to our discover then. That is what we will do now. “

Leave a Comment

A note to our visitors

This website has updated its privacy policy in compliance with changes to European Union data protection law, for all members globally. We’ve also updated our Privacy Policy to give you more information about your rights and responsibilities with respect to your privacy and personal information. Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our updated privacy policy.